I am curious about your position regarding quality and harmprevention. We know that it is important to uphold and support ahigh-quality care health system. Knowing that not everyone is thesame and a cookie-cutter approach is not viable, how do youdetermine what plan is best? Is it the one that causes the leastharm? Best outcomes? As part of some brainstorming session, I haveseen models where the chance for best outcomes and more harm doexist. When held to meet metrics and quality measures by variousexternal bodies, how do you determine when it is okay to worryabout improving metrics, yet risking the chance of impactinganother metric?
(Visited 3 times, 1 visits today)